Search This Blog

Wednesday 1 June 2011

Periapical Radiography: Bisecting Angle Technique


  • Alternative to paralleling technique
  • Not as accurate:
  • Prone to more distortion than paralleling technique
  • Must use BSA technique if anatomically difficult to position film in parallel alignment:
    • Shallow palate 
    • Shallow floor of mouth

      Two differences between BSA and paralleling techniques:
    • Film placed as close as possible to crown of tooth, so film is NOT parallel to long axis – tilts at an angle from tooth.
    • Vertical angle of central ray perpendicular to line that bisects angle between long axis of tooth and film.

      If vertical angle is aligned perpendicular to bisecting
      line, the tooth is projected on the film with minimal
      distortion, although it is usually more distorted than
      it would appear on a paralleling
      periapical radiograph



      All other aspects of BSA technique are the same as paralleling:
      • Horizontal angulation
      • Film positioning in arch
      • Alignment of central ray to cover film